Innovation Integrates Easily in Your LMS

At Innovation, we know where we fit — and just as importantly, where we don’t. We understand that tools like Google Classroom, Schoology, and Canvas have become the backbone of digital learning for many schools. Districts invest in these platforms for their compatibility, reporting features, and teacher training.

And that’s fine with us.

Innovation is a full-featured learning management system in its own right, but we don’t expect to replace the LMS you already rely on. Instead, we complement it. Our design philosophy is simple: Innovation plugs into the LMS you already use — quickly, easily, and effectively.

Seamless Integration Through Links

If your LMS allows you to include external links (and almost all of them do), then you can integrate Innovation activities in minutes. Here’s how:

  • One-Click Links to Activities:
    Every Innovation learning task can generate a unique external link. Just click the link button next to an activity, copy it, and paste it directly into a module, assignment, or announcement in your LMS.
  • Link Lists for Topics:
    Want to include an entire sequence of activities? Use the Link List option from the Topic control dropdown. It instantly creates a formatted list of links to all activities within that topic, ready to paste into your LMS for students to access in order.
  • Evaluation Links:
    When it comes time to assess student work, Innovation makes it just as easy. The Evaluation button produces a link to the task scoresheet, which you can paste into your LMS, email to students, or drop into a video conference chat.

Works With Your Live Sessions

Innovation also shines in live teaching environments. If you’re conducting sessions over Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or Google Meet, Innovation integrates seamlessly:

  • Start your live session in your chosen platform.
  • Open the relevant Innovation activity in your browser.
  • Share your screen as you guide students through the task.
  • With a single click, generate a participation link and paste it into the video conference chat so students can follow along or complete tasks simultaneously.

Why This Matters

Teachers don’t need another siloed platform to manage. You already have enough logins, dashboards, and gradebooks to juggle. With Innovation, you get powerful, purpose-built learning activities that fit into your existing workflow without disruption.

We believe in meeting teachers and students where they already are — which, for many of you, is inside your district’s LMS. Innovation gives you the flexibility to enrich your LMS with engaging, structured learning tasks and robust evaluation tools — without asking you to abandon what’s already working.

New Feature: Age Levels Added for AI Chat Reply Style

The new AI educational assistant chat app at Innovation is definitely one of our most popular applications! It is extremely flexible and reliable for delivering structured, natural, and appropriate interactive learning.

Readers may recall that the Innovation chat feature can be hosted or host-less and can include AI interactions. Teachers license students for a certain number of interactions and teachers define in advance the “reply style” of the AI. This means that teachers set up important guidelines to make the learning experience most effective.

In response to teacher feedback, we’ve added a new set of age group reply style options to help the AI adjust its language and tone even more precisely to the students it interacts with. Alongside the existing CEFR-level options (for world language learning) and conversational styles, teachers can now specify an age group — such as upper elementary, junior high, high school, or college — when configuring the chat assistant.

These age group settings guide the AI to choose vocabulary, sentence structure, and tone that are more appropriate and engaging for the selected audience. For example, when set to upper elementary, the AI uses simpler words and a more encouraging tone; when set to college, it uses a more formal and intellectually challenging style.

We encourage teachers to select one or two complementary styles rather than many at once, to keep the AI’s responses focused and consistent. As always, settings can be adjusted at any time, allowing teachers to fine-tune the experience based on their students’ needs and goals.

We’re excited to see how teachers use these new options to tailor conversations even more effectively. You can find the new age group settings in the AI Reply Style section of the chat setup page, alongside the existing style options. As always, we welcome your feedback — let us know how the chat assistant is working for your students and what additional refinements would make it even more useful.

New Feature: AI-assisted Grammar Studies for World Language Learners

Innovation’s AI integrations are expanding this summer, with enhancements to all areas of our platform!

This week, we’re excited to announce that AI support has been added to our grammar application, designed for learners of world languages.

The grammar app presents prompts for students to practice applying rules in their target language — such as verb conjugations, adjective agreement, spelling, and more.

Last spring, we introduced AI tools for teachers to easily generate customized grammar tasks.

This month, we’ve added AI assistance for students as they complete the tasks. Teachers can license students for a set number of AI assists during an exercise. After entering and saving their response to a prompt, students can click ✨ Ask AI to receive feedback.

When errors are detected, the AI provides thoughtful hints to guide students toward correcting and improving their answers — encouraging learning and mastery, rather than simply giving away the correct answer.

Mastery Learning at Innovation

The best way to sum up Innovation’s support of mastery learning is customization. A foundational principal of mastery learning is to identify areas where students need more work and then to provide that practice.

Innovation’s data analysis tools, including AI supported analyses, facilitate accurate and speedy identification of areas for continued student support.

Innovation’s AI teaching assistant makes generating these customized training and study tasks very efficient, effective, and rapid.

Mastery learning is an instructional approach in which students progress at their own pace, demonstrating a high level of understanding through frequent formative assessments and targeted corrective feedback before moving on to new material. By design—clear goals, adaptive pathways, real-time feedback, and built-in remediation—the Innovation platform strongly supports a mastery learning approach.

Mastery learning begins at finding out where the students are. Pretests assessing prior knowledge are important to find students’ entry point into the curriculum. At Innovation, pretests are easily constructed (especially true with AI integrations for assessment creation and data analysis) and saved to teachers’ course list for later re-use.

In a mastery learning approach, students have regular opportunities for formative assessment and to track their progress. At Innovation, task development and assessment is strongly supported by artificial intelligence. Instant scoring and annotated feedback in “debriefing” mode both help support the kind of formative feedback so important to track progress and chart the course.

Data-driven decision making is a cornerstone of the mastery learning class. Innovation’s proctor AI tracks student activity and progress and reports useful summaries with analysis to guide the next steps.

So let’s think about what makes mastery learning difficult to implement. Designing varied, on-level practice problems is a hill to climb. Writing multiple versions of questions (with different contexts, difficulty levels, etc.) to hit each student’s zone of proximal development can be very time consuming.

But that’s where Innovation truly shines: removing the friction from implementation.

One of the greatest barriers to mastery learning in traditional classrooms is the sheer labor it demands. Teachers are already stretched thin, and the work of creating varied, on-level practice tasks tailored to individual needs — often in multiple formats and difficulty bands — can seem insurmountable. Similarly, analyzing formative data, spotting patterns, and designing the right interventions in a timely way is hard when done manually.

Innovation helps teachers overcome these hurdles. Our AI tools generate differentiated practice materials in seconds, informed by real student data. They can craft multiple versions of an assessment item that target different skill levels or learning gaps, and even suggest scaffolded supports or enrichment challenges for advanced learners.

What’s more, Innovation’s platform makes tracking progress and growth transparent for both teacher and student. Students can see their own progress through clear visualizations and feedback, helping build motivation and ownership of learning. Teachers, in turn, can make quick, informed decisions about who needs more support, who’s ready to advance, and what kinds of practice will be most effective for each learner.

At its heart, mastery learning is about equity — ensuring every student has the time, support, and resources to truly master each concept before being pushed forward. Innovation empowers teachers to deliver on that promise, making mastery learning not only possible, but practical and scalable.

With Innovation, mastery learning becomes less of an ideal and more of a reality: a personalized pathway for every learner, supported by data, driven by AI, and guided by the teacher’s expertise.

What “Licensing” AI Interactions for Students Means at Innovation

I think we are all still finding our way in using AI in education. Recent surveys show many students and teachers are using AI. Consistent with what we have seen in previous technological changes that become adopted into education, they must be adapted from their design origins in the adult workplace. That adaptation is what Innovation intends to enable. 

In earlier posts, I described the importance of “guardrails” in 21st century learning spaces for students. Adults who depend on a digital workspace are largely self-directed. They shut off notifications that distract. They focus their attention on completing the at hand. They manage digital resources and devices so as to keep them working smoothly (limit the number of tabs open in a browser and keep them working smoothly keyboard clean). Students, even older high school students, possess fewer of these self-disciplines. Youngsters are by nature more slaves to their impulses than many adults, so incorporating AI in the classroom should include the kinds of externally-imposed guardrails analogous to those we imposed in our classrooms in real space. 

There is a growing number of AI integrations at Innovation that allow students to interact with AI in their lessons here. For one, there is the chat feature where students can discuss a topic and even practice another language with the AI. This offers an opportunity for practice that includes important guardrails. The principal one is the “license”. 

At Innovation, any application where AI faces students is designed with limits selected by the teacher in advance. This is the license. 

Firstly, the license limits the number of interactions between the student and the AI on that particular task. This will pose an obstacle to wandering off topic or incurring unnecessary costs (since AI interactions are metered in subscriptions to the service). In the chat application and in the asynchronous discussion app, students are reminded at the start that there is a particular objective to be met within a certain number of turns at conversation. With practice, this should keep most students on task and avoid conversations to nowhere. 

Secondly, the teacher sets the AI’s reply style when creating licenses for students on an application. Settings include age level of the students, the attitude of the replies (scholarly debater? Challenging devil’s advocate? Chatty dialogue partner?) and for language learners the difficulty level of the chat on the CEFR scale (A1, B2, etc). The AI can help keep the student on track and offer suggestions for improved student contributions. 

Now, you could log in to ChatGPT and have students type all these guidelines into the prompt field and then engage in the educational exercise, but the impracticality of that is obvious. 

Besides the license configuration, two additional guardrails at Innovation are that all interactions are recorded and all are set up to be evaluated. This gives teachers important supervisory powers. They can see what the student said to AI and evaluate the effectiveness of the interaction. 

AI integrations at Innovation extend beyond synchronous chat and asynchronous discussion forums. The grammar application, for example, also offers AI licenses. 

The grammar application is designed to help students learn grammatical structures in another language. It presents cues of various kinds such as incomplete sentences or short structures to conjugate or decline. There is an AI integration that teachers can license such that the AI gives advice on the answers, such as hints at correcting mistakes or praise for correct responses. Like with chat and discussion, teachers set the number of interactions and the style of the reply in advance. Interactions are recorded; responses are set up for evaluation. 

Adopting AI in education means adapting the technology to the educational context. It must account for maturity level, for targeted skills, and work within boundaries of the current unit or module’s content objectives. The “licensing” concept at Innovation is an important part of that adaptation. If you are not a subscriber, why not sign up for our 60-day free trial?

Trust, Accountability, and A.I. in Education

Robert Capps authored an article appearing in the New York Times in June 2025 entitled A.I. Might Take Your Job. Here Are 22 New Ones It Could Give You. The article articulates some key ideas about the direction of A.I. in intellectual work that, in my view, have strong relevance to education.

Mr. Capps believes that there are three areas where humans will continue to be necessary in an economy with A.I. presence: trust, integration, and taste.

“As A.I. continues to become more influential in our jobs and organizations,” writes Mr. Capps, “we’re going to develop a lot of these trust issues. Solving them will require humans.” “The ‘trust issues’ he refers to stem from the fact that A.I. can generate large amounts of data, but that doesn’t make it inherently trustworthy.

We will need humans to check the data and to check the ethics of what is being produced. Trust, he writes, is about accountability and who is taking responsibility for the work product that A.I. has been used to produce. “In a number of fields”, he writes, “from law to architecture, A.I. will be able to do much of the basic work customers need… but at some point, a human, perhaps even a certified one, needs to sign off on the work.”

Mr. Capps’ purpose is to describe changes in the job market that are likely to occur in the “creative destruction” happening in the economy as A.I. technology is increasingly deployed. But further, the concept of trust and accountability articulates an important element of our approach to and philosophy of integrating A.I. into our teaching platform. Every one of our applications that incorporate A.I., and that is soon to be all of them, is designed such that A.I. work product is reviewed and monitored by the instructor before it is published in activities and assessments for students. There is, for example, no “Make me a test on positive and negative integers” button at Innovation. There is no “grade all my student’s papers please” button. All of the A.I. integrations are placed in the same user interface that would be used before there was A.I. A form is filled out, but the teacher needs to review and modify if necessary, or possibly even discard, the A.I. work product.

I realize that this design policy may place Innovation at a disadvantage in the marketplace, where competition between online educational platforms is intense. Instructors may be attracted to the one-button-does-it-all platform. But my conversations with educational professionals and with my students lead me to conclude that discerning subscribers will prefer Innovation precisely because teachers want to foster that trust by demonstrating that accountability through a platform whose very design and structure promotes them.

World Language Conversation Training at Innovation

This application is for our world language teachers. The Directed Conversation is a training and evaluation tool for world language courses for conversational fluency. Notably, readers may recognize this format as that used in the AP French exam.

Innovation has two apps of note here. One is the generator, the other is the app to conduct a directed conversation.

The Generator

The generator lets teachers create, with optional assist from AI, a directed conversation at the level they need for their students. Innovation uses the “Common European Framework of Reference for Languages” (CEFR)) standard to define linguistic competence at various levels. The CEFR is widely used to assess and compare the language proficiency of learners across different languages and educational systems. To run the generator, teachers complete the basic form:

Once set, teachers can use the AI integration to generate a conversation according to the criteria they set. Once checking and editing, teachers can save the task to use with students.

Conversation Levels in Our App: What They Look Like

🌱 A Level – Beginner (Student-Directed Conversations)

  • Conversations are simple and highly structured.
  • The instructor’s lines are fully written out in the target language, like a script.
  • The student sees step-by-step English instructions for what to do (e.g., “Ask for a drink”), but they are not given exact words to say.
  • Focus: The student practices basic survival phrases and predictable interactions, like ordering food or asking for directions.
  • Example format:
    • Student – Ask for a table for two.
    • Instructor – Bien sĂ»r, par ici.

🔹 B Level – Intermediate (Improvised, Goal-Based Conversations)

At this level, conversations are more flexible and involve guided improvisation.

There are two conversation types:

  • Instructor Starts:
    The instructor follows prompts written in the target language to improvise their parts.
    The student’s tasks remain in English as communicative goals (e.g., “Ask the price”).
  • Student Starts:
    The student leads the conversation by following English prompts (e.g., “Explain your travel plans”).
    The instructor follows prompts in the target language to guide the conversation, but now both participants are improvising.
  • Focus: Building the ability to navigate everyday situations and handle less predictable responses.

🔸 C Level – Advanced (Fully Improvised, High-Level Conversations)

These conversations are complex, nuanced, and resemble real-life discussions.

There are two conversation types:

  • Instructor Starts:
    Both student and instructor follow target-language prompts (e.g., “Express surprise”, “Invite the other person to develop an idea”).
    No English is used in the conversation setup.
  • Student Starts:
    The student leads using target-language prompts to achieve communicative goals.
    The instructor follows improvisation cues also written in the target language.
  • Focus: Encouraging spontaneous, natural conversation with sophisticated language, similar to what’s expected in AP-level or advanced real-world exchanges.

The directed conversation app can be used with one or a group of students. This app has many tools to facilitate either interaction, presumably over a video conferencing app.

  • As students complete their turn, the teacher can mark the line complete so that both can keep track of where they are in conversation.
  • If it is an assessment, the teacher can score the student’s turn.
  • If it is a practice and teachers enter new words or phrases that students request into the “useful words” text field, it is possible to make flashcards practice right away.
  • If it is a class, students can be sent a join link and can be prompted to record something of what they hear in their classmates’ response.

Give our directed conversation (conversations dirigée) app a try today!

Structured AI Chat at Innovation

Innovation is proud to introduce its newest learning tool: structured AI chat.

We created this feature to empower students to practice conversations and engage with course material outside of class time. Although originally designed for world language learners, our AI chat works beautifully across disciplines, making it a versatile resource for content-based courses as well.

At Innovation, we believe technology should enhance learning in structured, meaningful ways. We call our applications “21st-century learning spaces“—they’re carefully designed to meet educational best practices and support student growth.

Teachers have two powerful ways to use AI chat: hosted or hostless.

The AI’s responses follow strict, teacher-defined parameters.

Hosted Chat: This mirrors Innovation’s original synchronous chat app where teachers facilitated real-time conversations between students. The key difference? Now, students can be paired with AI personas instead of classmates.

Hostless Chat: These are independent, self-paced chat assignments that students can complete on their own. But they’re not free-for-alls—the guardrails are still firmly in place:

The chat transcript is automatically recorded.

Students have a limited number of turns with the AI.

When teachers set up a chat, they set the boundaries of the conversation by limiting its length and defining the AI persona’s role.

Students are always responsible to start the conversation. When the chat starts, the assignment is clear and the AI’s interaction protocols are clearly stated.

The AI persona will keep the student on track even if they attempt to distract it with irrelevant questions.

Here, the student tried to distract by asking about sports and the AI brought the discussion back to task.

Once completed, Innovation provides an app to evaluate the quality of the student’s interactions in the chat.

This summer, I will add an AI grading assistant to help assess student work in a chat.

While this was initially envisioned for language students, its use in teaching content became clear. In this example, we set up these parameters for the AI persona:

By the way, teachers can optionally include “accessories” such as a PDF article or a video for students to review before discussion.

Here is how our chat with the Ai started for a critical discussion of the causes of the French revolution.

Our sample conversation went on like this:

Ever true to the parameters set for it, the AI persists in challenging the student to think more deeply and clearly define their points.

The AI chat feature at Innovation has great potential to enrich assignments and promote critical thinking in content courses and linguistic fluency in language classes. Try it out!

AI Tokens

Users may have noted the new AI Dashboard in their control panel at Innovation and the new pricing tiers that reference “AI tokens”. What are AI tokens and what can you do with them?

Innovation is integrating AI into every one of its applications now. It is not only a place to teach and learn, it is now a place to create high quality resources to support teaching and learning!

Subscribers to Innovation now have a certain allotment of tokens per month. A “token” is a fundamental unit of text that large language models (LLMs) use to process and generate language. It can be a word, a part of a word, or even a punctuation mark. When you interact with an AI model, your input (prompts) and the model’s output (responses) are broken down into tokens. The cost of using AI services is directly tied to the number of tokens processed. Generally, the more tokens used, the higher the cost. Because Innovation pays per token used via OpenAI, your monthly token allotment is designed to balance value and cost in a fair, transparent way.

During development, I maintained a logging script to see how many tokens I used to complete the various tasks. Unsurprisingly, essay grading is our most token-intensive task, averaging around 1881 tokens per interaction.
Vocabulary List Generation is the least token-intensive, consuming significantly fewer tokens.

Of course, token usage varies widely. Some teachers provide detailed outlines when asking the AI to generate tests or discussion prompts based on video or reading material. Others might use the AI heavily for grading essays or enabling student chat discussions. Your usage will shape how far your tokens go.

At the “pro” tier, you get 100,000 AI tokens / month. This resets every 30 days from the date you have a paid subscription. So what can you do with that? Well, based on my own usage (remember, I teach remotely part-time out of Innovation myself!) …

So, what does 100,000 AI tokens actually look like in practice for a teacher? Well, based on my own usage, it’s quite a lot of creative power at your fingertips! For example, you could grade around 53 essays (that’s right, those token-intensive ones!), or generate over 130 sets of test questions for your classes. Need a quick conversation starter for a foreign language class or a debate prompt? You could generate almost 180 conversations. And if you’re building vocabulary, you’re in luck – you could create an incredible 877 vocabulary lists with that many tokens! It really opens up a world of possibilities for creating high-quality teaching and learning resources.